Ashley J

The examples and explanations were super easy to follow and gave me an idea of what I will see on the SAT

Learner · 1 mo. ago

Yes, there was clear evidence of progress during the session. For example, in the “We do” phase, learners who initially struggled with the morphological variability question were able to select the correct answer after your guidance, showing they had internalized the concept. Additionally, learners showed increasing confidence as the session progressed, with quicker and more accurate responses, particularly in the graph-related questions, where they applied your earlier explanations to make correct choices.

Tutor · 1 mo. ago

During the “I do” phase, your explanations were clear, especially when you annotated passages to highlight key points, such as during the discussion about species counts. However, more frequent check-ins during this phase would help ensure that learners are following along. In the “We do” phase, you did well by asking learners to explain their reasoning, such as when Ojas was confused between B and C, but involving more learners in the discussion would further enhance engagement. In the “We do” phase, you gave learners the opportunity to apply what they had learned, and your follow-up explanations, such as the detailed breakdown of the REM sleep graph, effectively reinforced their understanding.

Tutor · 1 mo. ago

You created a safe and encouraging learning environment by consistently providing positive feedback and reassurance. When learners made mistakes, you used these moments as opportunities for growth rather than criticism. To further enhance this, you could offer more personalized praise for correct reasoning to build confidence, such as highlighting when a learner correctly identified the key parts of a passage.

Tutor · 1 mo. ago